“Insurrection” Book Symposium – Rollins’s Response to Clark

The symposium on Peter Rollin’s Insurrection has been a really great exchange so far. Katharine Moody engaged with Pete’s work helpfully on the level of philosophy, bringing Pete’s work further into conversation with one of his main influences, Slavoj Zizek. Jason Clark’s review approached Pete’s work from a pastoral perspective, offering some challenging reflections on Pete’s work with respect to situating Pete in relation to historical and confessional theology. Pete’s response to Clark is below. You can read more about Pete and his work at his website. Thanks for all the interaction in the comments. With this post, the Symposium concludes, but can the conversation can continue with your comments.

Ten Thousand Angels Are Not Enough: Reflections on Jason Clark’s Review

I appreciate the concerns that Jason raises in his reflection on Insurrection and will try to address what I take to be his main criticism. Before doing so however I just want to push back on one minor point. Jason seems frustrated that I make certain generalisations. But I am not so sure that this is, in and of itself, a problem. When one wishes to make observations concerning some underlying structural reality manifested in the historically concrete, one explicitly does this. We do not carry around maps the size of the territory we are seeking to explore. They are scaled down and, as such, miss the vast majority of minor, insignificant details. The purpose of the map is to accurately portray the information needed to get to where you want to go.

The issue then is not that I make generalisations (even multi-volume texts on specific parts of church history do that), but whether the generalisations are accurate descriptions of underlying structural tendencies.

So what are my generalisations? In brief the primary one is that there are two broad tendencies in the church today, either we find communities that explicitly treat God as a garniture of meaning (our faith gives us a way of understanding the world and our place within it, God acts as a being who offers happiness, satisfaction and bliss, i.e., is treated like a product etc.) or we are free to question the idea of God as garniture of meaning while the liturgical structure we participate in continues to treat God in this way (thus acting as a type of security blanket). The map I draw won’t, of course, be a 1:1 of the territory it describes. The question rather is whether it puts its finger on a virtually ubiquitous underlying reality (and here, unlike elsewhere, I think I stand very close to the late Bonhoeffer). I then go on to try and show why this notion of God is problematic and how we might create collectives where the liturgical structure draws us into an encounter with our own brokenness.

Let us now consider what seems to be Jason’s main concern. He makes the case that I do not pay enough heed to the confessional theological tradition, that I am not interested in the historical context of the theological terms I employ and that I reduce central Christological claims to mere existential events. If we were to go head to head on these issues I would like to tease the claims out a little more and push back a bit. However, to a greater or lesser degree, I can agree with his assessment. My interest in this book (though not my sole theological interest) is to explore the existential import of Christianity (the subjective in Kierkegaard’s sense – meaning the way that its transforms our subjectivity).

An analogy might help to elucidate what I mean. If I am an analyst and someone comes to me to talk about their memories, dreams and fantasies I do not ask myself whether or not they are historically accurate descriptions of empirically observable situations. Rather I delve into the meaning they have for the individual. Together we explore their subjective significance. This does not mean that I judge them to be false in some objective way. Rather the question of historicity is bracketed out so that we can concentrate on the meaning and power of what is being discussed. I would, if I had space, argue that this type of approach to the faith is an eminently theological project and that if one wants to talk about the historical claims of Christianity a better person to dialogue with would be a well-trained archaeologist or historian.

To make his point Jason quotes me saying that God is not someone we directly encounter and thus not one we directly experience. His point, if I understand correctly, is that I am not interested in the objective reality of God, even rejecting the idea completely. As an aside the statement that he quotes can actually be seen as a rather orthodox one (there are many places throughout the Bible that speak of humans not being able to directly encounter God, let alone the ideas of God as found in the midst of service to the other). But the point that I am making (which he does not refer to) is not primarily related to this. Rather I am presenting the idea that the notion of “rebirth” does not, properly understood, actually describe an experience but rather the transformation of how we experience everything (just as one does not experience birth, for birth is what opens one up to experience).

This takes me to the heart of why I am interested in bracketing out the debates that saturate the popular arena of religious debate. To understand this let me take the example of the rabbi of Gur that I employ in The Fidelity of Betrayal. The story goes that during the Second World War he escaped from Germany and met with Winston Churchill to talk about the Nazi war machine. The story goes that this rabbi said, “there are two ways in which the Nazis could be stopped: the natural and the supernatural. The natural solution would involve 10,000 angels with flaming swords descending upon Germany. The supernatural would involve 10,000 Englishmen parachuting down from the sky.”

The point is that is if 10,000 angels with flaming swords descended upon Germany this would be a natural event. In other words these angels would act like other objects in the world; they would be seen, heard, and experienced. These angels would exist within space and time like every other object.

In contrast, the rabbi speaks of a supernatural response, namely 10,000 British soldiers descending in parachutes. Here the rabbi is hinting at a deep change in the hearts of the British that would precipitate such a drastic response. This change, for the rabbi, would be deeply supernatural because the change itself would not be something that could be captured in a laboratory or measured by reference to some purely utilitarian calculation. Unlike the descent of warrior angels, this change would not lend itself to be approached as a natural object to be reflected upon; it would not be made manifest to the senses but indirectly testified to in certain actions.

This no more excludes the possibility of phenomenon being influenced by something outside a closed system of cause and effect than it affirms them. Rather the point is that physical changes are natural insomuch as they take place in the natural realm. In contrast conversation on a miracle worthy of the name does not register it as an object that can be recorded and beamed around the world but rather refers to an event so radical that while nothing need change in the physical world nothing remains the same for the one who undergoes it.

  • Jon Annett

    Pete,

    I have been incredibly blessed through your work and value your honoring of the darkness and pain of life through your work with the cross. I know that much of your work is intentionally philosophically inclined and high level. However, it leaves me anxious to “see how you live” in certain situations….what does it look like to be Pete Rollins, what does he pray, how does he console, what does this “God embodying love” look like when worked out.

    I have read and re-read insurrection as well as your other books in the past few months and have found life in your critique of the current state of Christianity as well as your embrace of the multi-dimensional betrayal of the cross. I am taking the liberty of posting this link as Jason shared it publically this morning, and hope that I am not overstepping my bounds by bringing his true life and background into the conversation. A bit of his heart wrenching story is posted on the below blog.

    http://jasonclark.ws/is-the-cross-bigger-than-the-suicide-of-both

    Is God not a source of comfort and strength in these situations? What is the power of the resurrection, is it only a validation that life is going to suck and to live well in the midst of its difficulties. Escape or Easy is not what Jason (or I) would expect, but is God anything more than a voice in our heads when life collapses? Is there not a source of strength beyond ourselves?

    I understand you say things for affect and understand your “most of the time I don’t believe in the resurrection”, but I am assuming that the historical event is the foundation on which you have built your life/career.

    I was just enjoying the philosophical talk until it got real….then needed a bit more.

    Jon

  • Jason Clark

    Hi Pete,

    Thanks for your response to my review. I wasn’t sure if you were taking part in comments, so I have held off replying to you for a few days.

    Your responses to my review are helpful for me to understand your work better, and if I may can I respond to some of them?

    I appreciate the need for generalisations, and the issue of ‘mapping’ is key. But I still think you provide very little mapping at all within your generalisations. Some nuance around your generalisations, to signpost that you are making a map, what you are mapping and the limits of your map. My query was not that you made generalisations per se but that they had no mapping to navigate. When you talk about the church needing to be completely reformed, are you talking about all of the church, completely, or your experience of an evangelical segment, for example? Telling me you have made a map, still leave me not sure what the map is about? What is the key to the map, it’s legend and scale? If you are referring to certain sections of pietistic forms of church that avoid the cross in their spirituality I can agree with that. But again if you are referring to the whole church, I think you have missed some major features on even the most cursory of maps, with a theology of the cross that I gave as an example.

    And then you say, ‘My interest in this book (though not my sole theological interest) is to explore the existential import of Christianity (the subjective in Kierkegaard’s sense – meaning the way that its transforms our subjectivity).’ Thank you, that is most helpful. So my suspicions were right, you weren’t making a work of ‘pyro-theology’, but a suggestion for your own ‘pyro-philosophy’ perhaps?

    You rightly take me to task on my philosophical method, for which I make no claims of expertise :-) And in that sense I have tried the same with regards to biblical and theological method with Insurrection. For whilst you claim an historical and theological horizon, Insurrection by your own admission (above) isn’t that at all. Or at least not that anyone within theological disciplines would recognise apart from maybe Bultmann reading Heidegger?

    I don’t think you need Bonhoeffer to set up your philosophy unless you can show that despite his confessional faith,there was something in Bonhoeffer’s work that resonates with your ‘pyro-philosophy’. Perhaps my concern is that taking a theme from Bonhoeffer and then running that into existential philosophy is the kind of mixophilosophicotheologia that Heidegger warned us not to undertake.

    As a confessional Christian, I do think that the bracketing out of the historical claims about Jesus are not just the domain of an archaeologist or historian, but are intrinsic to any theology and discussion about Christianity. I think Bonhoeffer would take exception to you relegating his christology to the realism of archaeology. For confessional christians something is at stake around a theology centred on a real immanent, dying and resurrected Jesus, beyond historical facts. No experience of the cross is possible without a cross, not to mention how we access that experience and reality, as I have tried to detail in my review.

    With your rabbi and nazi story, I think this is a kind of supernaturalist fallacy. By that I mean a progression or re-emergence of an explaining away of supernatural or mysterious phenomemena, in a Bultmann-ian direction that would edit out scripture and theology and arrange faith more towards our post modern anxieties? So some might see Jesus as a man dying on the cross, and nothing more, whilst others with eyes of faith can see a risen saviour, but they are both the same, just a matter of perspective for you?

    Which brings me back to my review: I think I talk about Jesus, you think I am talking about myself, and that it doesn’t matter either way, we just have a natural and supernatural perspective difference? If your story is true then there is no real cross for me go to, to meet Jesus on and the cross becomes an experience of utter abandonment, of the cross from the cross itself?

    That seems designed to cause me to avoid the very process you invite me into? If there is no cross, why bother trying to go to it? I’d rather avoid it then, thank you :-)

    Good to get the chance to talk with you Pete, thanks again for provoking me into learning.

  • Pingback: What Troubles You about Peter Rollins? Towards an Assessment Part I | Gladys Ganiel

  • Pingback: td

  • Pingback: company website

  • Pingback: Hahasport.com

  • Pingback: http://www.GroceryCouponsSource.com/

  • Pingback: spy gearhttp://www.thespycorner.com

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: blog

  • Pingback: psychic schools

  • Pingback: erie

  • Pingback: car insurance for

  • Pingback: Visit CBA

  • Pingback: trench femme

  • Pingback: coconut oil

  • Pingback: website

  • Pingback: (http://www.squidoo.com/iphone-5-australia

  • Pingback: Besök Flowerhouse

  • Pingback: coconut diet

  • Pingback: auto repair Austin Texas

  • Pingback: coconut

  • Pingback: business for sale

  • Pingback: hair

  • Pingback: John Cracken Dallas

  • Pingback: coconut oil benefits

  • Pingback: thexraytechnician.net

  • Pingback: Patrick Anderson

  • Pingback: coconut oil

  • Pingback: zwemshorts

  • Pingback: grippy sock favors

  • Pingback: helposti rahaa

  • Pingback: amazon.com

  • Pingback: training for phlebotomy

  • Pingback: Scarlett's Toy Box

  • Pingback: bingo maker

  • Pingback: halloween scavenger hunt ideas

  • Pingback: rb 3293

  • Pingback: visit site

  • Pingback: christmas around the world scavenger hunt

  • Pingback: ray ban wayfarer 2140

  • Pingback: herpes

  • Pingback: payday loans

  • Pingback: convertxtodvd free

  • Pingback: zwembroeken mannen

  • Pingback: zwembroek

  • Pingback: how to make a website

  • Pingback: cam sex girl

  • Pingback: P90X2

  • Pingback: Buy Wood Windows Direct at Factory Prices

  • Pingback: low vitamin d symptoms

  • Pingback: Buy Wood Windows Factory Direct

  • Pingback: reciprocal link checker

  • Pingback: site

  • Pingback: Handyortung

  • Pingback: dating website

  • Pingback: facebook of sex

  • Pingback: use

  • Pingback: rent apartment

  • Pingback: spells

  • Pingback: Buy Wood Windows Direct at Factory Prices

  • Pingback: Handyortung

  • Pingback: Handy orten

  • Pingback: stickers

  • Pingback: Santiago Frees

  • Pingback: Valda Waninger

  • Pingback: Factory Direct Prices

  • Pingback: eGo-T

  • Pingback: home insurance quote

  • Pingback: Factory Direct Prices

  • Pingback: maximuscle cyclone side effects

  • Pingback: read more information here

  • Pingback: http://www.envirospeak.tv

  • Pingback: cigarette electronique

  • Pingback: How Can I Get Healthy

  • Pingback: French Pastry Recipes

  • Pingback: online share dealing

  • Pingback: See you

  • Pingback: bist du einverstanden

  • Pingback: Driving Fear Program Review

  • Pingback: get youtube views

  • Pingback: lainat

  • Pingback: Buy Wood Windows Factory Direct

  • Pingback: Wood Windows at Factory Direct Prices