Books and Culture Reviews Silent Light

Roy Anker has reviewed Reygadas’ Silent Light for Books and Culture.

It features some nice descriptions of Reygadas’ overall effect:

To see the world this way, as if through a pair of Vermeer-tinged eyeglasses, is, frankly, startling. Perhaps this is Reygadas’ foremost gift: his “eye,” his luminous apprehension of the physical world. Whether it be the stolid, intractable fleshliness of humanity in Battle in Heaven, or here, among the Mennonites in Mexico, the palpable radiance of the sun on the high plains of Chihuahua and of the plain people in the plain, white interiors of their simple farmhouses, Reygadas imbues the full amplitude of being with just enough “whatever” to inspire awe—what he calls “contemplation.” And he does this without recourse to the cheesy devices that Hollywood uses to signal the portentous.

As well as some more specific scrutiny of its conclusion:

Reygadas seems fully aware of what he’s after, confessing in an interview, “In reality, I do not believe in miracles, but I think reality is a miracle.” So when the “wow” of the conclusion does come round, it seems a logical extension of the irreducible glory already contained in every sort of thing. Near the end, Marianne tells Johan that “peace is stronger than love,” at least of the romantic sort, and it is the fullness of peace, wrought by agapic love, that in the end accomplishes all. Indeed, that old Mennonite banner of peace seems to win the day, celebrating the quiet, grateful heart over the psycho-blitzes of passion and romance. In all of this, loss is perhaps the severest teacher. Reygadas cops his ending from a famous film by a famous Danish filmmaker, though he says his point is different. And so it is.

Excellent thoughts, though I wish he would have dabbled a bit more in the range of fairly overt biblical references made throughout the film to creation, eden, the flood, etc…

  • http://www.soulfoodmovies.blogspot.com Ron Reed

    Which leaves that dabbling to you, then, Mr Leary?

    Anker pays attention to light in this piece – appropriately, given not only the film’s aesthetic but also its title – and it’s a recurrent theme. His 2004 film book was “Catching Light: Looking for God in the Movies,” and in the Introduction he considers human veneration of light, and the ways that films reflect both light and Light. “One of the more surprising turns in the contemporary cinema of North America and Europe has been the regularity and maturity with which it has cast cinematic light on those ‘animating mysteries of the world,’ as Clarissa Vaughn in Michael Cunningham’s novel The Hours (1998) puts it. Like other characters in that novel, Clarissa ponders the origin and significance of the majesty she feels all around her: the possibility that ordinary physical light in fact emanates from Light, that ours is a radiant world made so by a Love that transfigures the material into resplendent glory.”

    He carries that focus throughout the book:
    Part One: Darkness Visible | The Godfather Saga, Chinatown, The Deer Hunter
    Part Two: Light Shines In The Darkness | Tender Mercies, Places In The Heart, The Mission, Babette’s Feast
    Part Three: Fables Of Light | The Star Wars Saga, Superman, Close Encounters, E.T., A.I.
    Part Four: Found | Grand Canyon, American Beauty, Three Colors: Blue

    It’s great to see Anker writing about current film. Though his book was published five years ago, it grows out of a Calvin College course he initiated in 1988, and while he has continued teaching and refining the syllabus, it is clearly rooted in the quasi-canon of spiritually engaged films of the seventies and eighties. I believe Anker is a literature professor, but he does a very good job engaging with film as film – the continued attention to his theme of light, and a good eye, make this much more than a “film as literature” study.

    Last thought: I wonder if he’s been reading Overstreet? While Jeffrey doesn’t have a copyright on the whole “dazzle gradually” thing – I’d love to see him try, the Dickinson estate would kick his butt from Seattle to New England – it wouldn’t surprise me if Anker’s been “Looking Closer”…

  • http://www.film-think.com M. Leary

    I confess that I have not read his book yet. I will as soon as I can track it down, as I liked the way he described Reygadas’ use of light so effectively. And now that you ask, I will post next week on the range of possible biblical references in Silent Light.

  • Pingback: Prokudin-Gorsky Reflected in Silent Light | Filmwell

  • Pingback: Silent Light (Reygadas, 2007) | Filmwell